|
PHOTOEPILATION
A comparative analysis of different light sources for better epilation
efficacy
Photoepilation hair removal with laser or lamp light sources is
considered nowadays to be the most effective and safe way to remove
excess or unwanted hair. This method of hair removal works using
the principle of selective photothermolysis in which a carefully
timed pulse of laser energy is delivered to hair shafts and bulbs
in such a manner as to destroy hair follicle while sparing the
surrounding skin structures.
A scheme of hair structure is shown in Figure below. The bottom
part of the hair follicle contains papilla which is fed by numerous
blood-vessels. The hair follicle is sided with a sebaceous gland,
a sweat gland and an arrector pilii muscle which lifts the hair.
Both hair shaft and follicle contain melanin – a pigment
which gives hair its color and can absorb emission of certain wavelengths.

Effective absorption of melanin occurs within the range between
600-1100 nm. Wavelengths under 600 nm are strongly absorbed
by blood microvessels and therefore cannot be used for hair removal;
wavelengths above 1100 nm are strongly absorbed by water in
tissue. The wavelengths available in the 600-1100 nm spectral
range are: 694 nm (Ruby laser), 755 nm (Alexandrite laser),
800 nm (diode lasers), 1064 nm (Nd:YAG laser) and wideband
pulsed light sources (550-1200 nm).
The present-day epilation market offers all the above light sources
thus emphasizing ambiguity of approaches applied to hair removal
by laser manufacturers, dealers and practicing cosmetologists.
Commercial models of hair removal light sources possess extremely
wide range of parameters: wavelength, pulse duration, fluence,
pulse repetition rate and beam diameter differ from model to model,
each individual system having practical experience in treatment
of patients with certain skin types, hair color and hair follicle
depth.
This complicates a choice for an end-user who requires well-defined
reasons while purchasing a system for efficient treatment of people
with different phototypes and of different age. Such a system should
combine maximum versatility, efficacy, reasonable cost and safety
for patient's skin as the melanin-bearing epidermis layer is also
very sensitive to laser energy, especially in 4, 5 and 6 phototypes,
Fitzpatrick classification (Table 1).
Besides, dependence of skin properties on seasonal solar activity
at different latitudes should also be concerned.
Table 1
| Skin Type |
Characteristics |
Populations |
| 1 |
Never tan, always burn (usually
very fair skin, blonde hair, blue/green eyes) |
Europeans |
| 2 |
Sometimes tan, but usually burn
(fair skin, light brown or chestnut hair, green/hazel eyes) |
Europeans |
| 3 |
Usually tan, but sometimes burn
(light olive skin, chestnut hair, hazel eyes) |
Europeans |
| 4 |
Always tan, never burn (olive skin,
dark hair, dark eyes) |
Asians, Indians, Caucasians |
| 5 |
Never burn (dark brown skin, black
hair, black eyes) |
Creoles, Mulattos |
| 6 |
Never burn (dark skin, black hair, black eyes) |
Black-skinned |
Does a universal system to treat a larger number of patients really
exist? No reply can be given to this question without studying
some basic principles on which skin and hair structures absorb
light.
Under the theory of selective photothermolysis, selective light
absorption is mainly influenced by a wavelength applied. The first
and most significant condition in choosing laser wavelength is penetration
depth which should be sufficient to target hair bulbs typically
resting at 2-4 mm depth.
Literature studies show that penetration of laser energy into
the skin is influenced by the following major factors:
a) light dissipation in the skin; authors (1, 8, 9) claim that
laser energy dissipation coefficient teadily decreases with increasing
wavelength (see Fig.1) thus providing deeper penetration of longer
wavelengths.
Fig.1. Absorption and scattering coefficient of
dermis with 1% of blood content
in the wavelength range of 400-1000 nm.
b) laser energy absorption by melanin present in skin and hair
structures; absorption coefficient is also decreasing with increasing
wavelength (Fig.1 and 2). There is a slight peak at 980 nm
due to absorption of energy by water. While at short wavelengths
the dependence of laser light absorption on hair color is strong
enough, at wavelengths higher than 1000 nm it diminishes significantly
(see Fig.2).
Fig.2. Light absorption by black and blond hair
as a function of wavelength.
Thus, shorter wavelengths (Ruby, Alexandrite, major spectrum of
a xenon lamp) are actively absorbed by hair what makes such photoepilators
more preferable at first sight. However, melanin contained in superficial
skin layers, although less concentrated than in hair, absorbs short
wavelengths strong enough to cause side effects during epilation.
Because of strong absorption in superficial skin layers short wavelengths
can only reach hair shafts and not deeply laid bulbs. Therefore
Ruby and Alexandrite lasers are better used for targeting undeep
hair bulbs in treatment of light-skinned patients (Fitzpatrick
type I and II). Furthermore, when dark-skinned patients (Fitzpatrick
types IV-V) are treated with 500800 nm laser energy
competitive absorption of light by hair and skin may cause singes
and pigmentation problems in the targeted tissue.
The aforesaid equally refers to lamp epilators - pulsed light
sources generating in the whole spectrum range of maximum absorption
by melanin-bearing skin components 500 (590)
1200 nm.
Long wavelengths emitted by a lamp photoepilator (900
1200 nm)
penetrate into skin deeply enough. Yet the main part of lamp epilator
energy falls within 500900 nm, and this range is very
strongly absorbed by melanin in the epidermal skin layer. Thus,
lamp epilators as well as Ruby, Alexandrite or diode lasers may
be dangerous in treatment of IV-VI Fitzpatrick types, and their
use is restricted by seasonal limitations and probable pigmentation
disorders in treatment sites. Filters used to "cut off" short
wavelengths considerably degrade lamp performance.

Nd:YAG systems generate 1064 nm wavelength which is much
less absorbed by melanin of skin and therefore much safer. On the
other hand, Nd:YAG laser energy is capable to pass deep into the
skin (up to 4 mm) and target hair bulbs at different depth
regardless the skin color. Curve approximation at 1064 nm
area (Fig.2) allows to speculate that absorption coefficient of
1064 nm laser energy is not greatly dependent on hair color
providing an opportunity to unify treatment modes for patients
with different hair color and skin types. This factor encourages
wide use of Nd:YAG lasers as versatile devices for hair removal
which may be applied to people with various phototypes, without
any seasonal or race limitations.
Another important factor influencing selection of a light source
for photoepilation is the level of photothermolysis selectivity,
i.e. proportion between temperature of a heated hair follicle and
adjacent epidermis layers. The main reason for difference in temperature
of hair and skin is unequal concentration of absorbing chromophore melanin;
hair usually contains more. To efficiently remove hair with different
follicle depth the photothermolysis selectivity level should be
sufficiently large over the whole site of light diffusion in the
skin.
Research shows (Fig.3a and 3b, (1)) that the photothermolysis
selectivity level rises with wavelength increase, and if the discussed
range within 690-1000 nm best fits for removing hair much
darker than skin, only wavelengths higher than 800 nm are
able to make follicle temperature exceed temperature of epidermis
in cases when the hair is only slightly darker than the skin. This
primarily applies to hair with deeply laid follicles. Analysis
of the stated factors shows that only wavelengths longer than 1000
nm (Nd:YAG systems) allow the ratio between follicle and epidermis
temperatures to be higher than 1 at 3-4 mm.
Fig.3a. Ratio between hair follicle temperature
(TH) and epidermis temperature (TE)
as a function of wavelength for different hair depth.
Hair-skin contrast is equal to 10 (hair are 10 times darker than
the skin).
Fig.3b. Ratio between hair follicle temperature
(TH) and epidermis temperature (TE)
as a function of wavelength for different hair depth.
Hair-skin contrast is equal to 5 (hair only slightly darker than
the skin).
Thus, thermal features of 1064 nm laser energy absorption
by skin and hair prove true the eventual wide use of Nd:YAG laser
systems as versatile devices for hair removal which may target
unwanted hair in patients with any skin type and follicle depth,
without seasonal or race limitations.
The aforesaid encouraged SOLAR LS - a company manufacturing
various laser systems on ruby, alexandrite and yttrium-aluminum
garnet - to choose an Nd:YAG laser medium as the most versatile
and safest hair removal system. The result of scientific and design
research performed by SOLAR LS together with practicing cosmetologists
is the DeLight a laser epilator on yttrium-aluminum
garnet which proves to be a unique combination of optimal characteristics
for efficient hair removal, versatility of use on a wide range
of patients, and moderate cost.
It is obvious that any laser medium fulfills its advantages only
if the optimum treatment conditions such as spot size, pulse duration
and fluence value are observed. We will try to give a brief explanation
on factors that determined a selection of the above mentioned parameters
for DeLight.
Spot size. The selection of a spot size is influenced by
two major reasons:
a) a large spot size allows to reduce a number of flashes and
lessens treatment time;
b) authors (5) claim that penetration into skin depends not only
on wavelength applied and skin color treated but also on the size
of a light spot. If a treated spot is smaller than penetration
depth light is dissipated and penetration decreases. Figure 4 reveals
that Ruby laser energy fluence is reduced to 20% at 2,6 mm
with 1 mm spot diameter and at 3,5 mm with 5 mm
spot.
Fig.4. A 694 nm light fluence distribution
at two different spot sizes.
Spots with 5 mm diameter are therefore to be used in order
to reduce dissipation effect. The Nd:YAG laser system is powerful
enough to meet this requirement without any complications. Due
to the high output DeLight offers a possibility of varying treatment
spots within 5-13 mm range, this parameter being the highest
among currently available laser epilators.
Energy fluence. Laser energy per pulse should be sufficient
to provide 25-50 J/cm2 fluence for maximum spot
size (1). The DeLight laser system features maximum energy value
in 80 J pulse thus satisfying the above requirement.
Pulse duration is a parameter which allows fine adjustment
of "milder" treatment modes ensuring maximum efficacy
and making the treatment absolutely painless. The point consists
in making treatment more selective due to optimization of pulse
duration. A choice of pulse width is determined by the thermal
relaxation time (TRT) the time it takes for 50% of energy
to be conducted away from a target tissue. When treatment is aimed
at damaging a target then pulse duration should be less or equal
to the target's TRT. To avoid overheat the tissue should be treated
with pulses greatly exceeding its TRT. Epidermis is the first to
be exposed during laser epilation and may be easily damaged by
high-power energies so pulse duration should exceed its thermal
relaxation time. Yet to destroy hair follicles laser energy should
be applied in a period shorter than the follicle TRT. The TRT for
the follicle is estimated to be 40-100 msec (4, 6, 7) depending
on its diameter while epidermis has 1-10 msec TRT. Therefore,
a hair removing device must use pulses longer than 10 msec
but shorter than 100 msec. The optimum pulse duration will
be 40-50 msec.
Authors (1) illustrate time dependence of epidermis and hair bulbs
temperature when targeted by 3 short pulses <7 msec with
20 msec interval (see Fig.5).
Fig.5. Temperature behavior in the epidermis and
in the hair bulb during a triple pulse.
The figure clearly shows that by the end of the third pulse the
bulb temperature increases to TH~80°C and epidermis
temperature is TE~58°C.
Most laser and lamp epilators currently available at the market
provide one-digit millisecond pulse duration, while "long-pulsed" systems
are more advantageous as they allow best results with minimum heating
of superficial skin layers. This, on one hand, makes skin cooling
almost unnecessary, on the other hand, allows to treat patients
whose skin and hair colour is least contrasted. The DeLight laser
epilator gives a possibility to select pulse duration within 1
to 50 msec.
Thus, specific features of the DeLight laser epilator present
an ideal combination ensuring effective hair removal in I-V phototypes
due to the right choice of energy fluence, spot diameter and "long" pulses.
Thermal safety, minimum treatment time and clinical efficiency
are characteristic for hair removal process performed with the
DeLight laser system.
For more information on the new DeLight long-pulse Nd:YAG laser
system click here
References:
1. G. Lask, S. Eckhouse, M. Slatkim et.al.
The role of laser and intense light sources in
photo-epilations: a comparative evaluation J. at Cutaneous Laser
Therapy, 1, 3 (1999)
2. K. Klavuhn Illumination geometry: The importance
of laser beam spatial characteristics/
Laser hair removal technical note ¹2: published by Coherent,
inc. (2000)
3. K. Klavuhn Epidermal protection: A comparative
analysis of sapphire contact and cryogen spray cooling
/ Laser Hair removal technical note ¹1: published
by Coherent, inc. (2000)
4. Scientific rationale for long pulse Nd:YAG
laser for hair removal /http://www.laserscope.com/treat/lyra_scientific.html
5. Keijzer M., Jacquse SL, Prahl SA, Welch
AJ. Light distribution in artery tissue: Monte Carlo
simulations for finite-diameter laser beams. / Laser
Surg Med 1989; 9; 148-54
6. Wheeland RG. Laser-assisted hair removal.
Dermatol Clin 1997; 15:459-77
7. Grossman MC, Dierickx CC, Farinelli W,
Flotte T, Anderson RR. Damage to hair follicles by
normal-mode ruby laser pulses. I Am Acad Dermatol
1996; 35:889-94
8. Svaasand, Norvang LT, Fiskerstrand EJ,
Stopps EKS, Bearns MW, Nelson JS. Tissue parameters
determining the visual appearance of normal skin
and port-wine stains. Laser Mad Sci 1995;
10; 55-65.
9. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. The optics of human skin. J
Invert Dermatol 1981; 77; 13-19 |